If you were hurt on the job in Las Vegas and a third party caused your injury, you may have two separate paths to compensation: your workers’ comp claim and a personal injury lawsuit. Subrogation is the legal process that determines how your workers’ compensation insurer can recover what it paid on your behalf from any money you win in that third-party case. Nevada law, specifically NRS 616C.215, governs these rights, and the 2024 Nevada Supreme Court decision in AmTrust North America, Inc. v. Vasquez along with the subsequent passage of SB 258 in 2025 have significantly reshaped the landscape for injured workers.
If you have questions about a third-party claim or a workers’ comp lien on your settlement, the team at Shook and Stone can help. Call 702-570-0000 or reach out online for a case evaluation.
How NRS 616C.215 Creates Subrogation Rights in Nevada
Nevada’s subrogation framework starts with NRS 616C.215, which governs third-party recovery and subrogation rights when an injured employee pursues a tort action while receiving workers’ comp benefits. When a third party (someone other than the employer or a co-employee) causes a work injury, the injured employee may sue that third party. However, workers’ comp benefits are subject to reduction by the amount of damages recovered from that third-party lawsuit.
Under NRS 616C.215, the workers’ comp insurer has a right of subrogation, meaning it can step into the employee’s shoes to recover from the liable third party. The insurer also has a lien on the total proceeds of any recovery, preventing double recovery while potentially reducing what an injured worker takes home from a settlement.
💡 Pro Tip: If you were injured on the job by someone other than your employer or coworker, such as a negligent driver or property owner, you may have a third-party claim alongside workers’ comp.
It is important to understand that workers’ compensation is generally the exclusive remedy against a covered employer for the underlying work injury — civil negligence lawsuits against the employer are typically barred. The third-party claim discussed in this article is only available against someone other than your employer or a co-employee, such as a negligent driver, property owner, or equipment manufacturer. Where the only negligent party is your employer, subrogation does not arise because there is no third-party lawsuit to pursue.
The Breen Formula, Vasquez, and Foundational Nevada Subrogation Cases
Nevada’s approach to dividing third-party recoveries between injured workers and insurers has a complex history shaped by case law. The subrogation framework was historically rooted in the “Breen formula” from Breen v. Caesars Palace, 715 P.2d 1070 (Nev. 1986), which established the methodology for allocating settlement funds between the worker and insurer.
Employers Insurance Co. of Nevada v. Chandler, 117 Nev. 421, 23 P.3d 255 (2001), further shaped this area by addressing how settlement funds interact with the insurer’s future credit. Poremba v. Southern Nevada Paving, 133 Nev. 12, 388 P.3d 232 (2017), later created a rule that workers’ comp insurers could not reach the noneconomic damages portion (such as pain and suffering) of a third-party settlement. This significantly eroded insurer lien rights and was one of the two decisions Vasquez overruled as being in direct conflict with the plain language of NRS 616C.215(5).
In September 2024, the Nevada Supreme Court fundamentally changed the subrogation landscape in AmTrust North America, Inc. v. Vasquez, 140 Nev. Adv. Op. 61 (2024). The court found the Breen formula unworkable and in conflict with the statute, overruling both Breen and Poremba. The Vasquez decision adopted a straightforward lien analysis where the insurer’s lien applies to total proceeds of any third-party recovery, including noneconomic damages, without deducting the injured employee’s litigation fees and costs. This ruling significantly strengthened insurer lien rights, creating the legislative impetus for SB 258.
Silvera v. EICON: Limiting Insurer Lien Rights
The Nevada Supreme Court placed important limits on insurer liens in Silvera v. EICON, 118 Nev. 105 (2002). EICON attempted to place a subrogation lien against an injured worker’s recovery from a UM/UIM policy maintained by a party other than the employer or employee. The court held that EICON could not place a lien against such a recovery.
This ruling reinforced that while the 1993 amendments to NRS 616C.215 — enacted specifically to expand insurer subrogation rights to employer-maintained UM/UIM policies — grant subrogation rights in that context, and the statute independently covers third-party tortfeasors, those rights still have limits that Silvera defined. Recovery from uninsured or underinsured motorist policies not maintained by the employer falls beyond the insurer’s reach.
💡 Pro Tip: If your work injury involved a motor vehicle accident and you recovered from a UM/UIM policy not maintained by your employer, your workers’ comp insurer may not be entitled to lien those proceeds.
How SB 258 Changed the Rules for Nevada Workers’ Comp Subrogation
Senate Bill 258, signed on May 31, 2025, represents the most significant reform to Nevada’s workers’ comp subrogation framework in decades. Enacted in response to the Vasquez decision, which had dramatically expanded insurer lien rights, the bill amends NRS 616C.215 and delivers meaningful protections for injured workers dealing with third-party recoveries.
The New One-Third Lien Cap
Under SB 258, a workers’ comp insurer’s lien recovery is now capped at the lesser of the full lien amount or one-third of the total third-party recovery. This ensures injured workers retain at least two-thirds of what they recover from a third-party lawsuit or settlement. Before this change, particularly after Vasquez, insurers could claim a much larger share.
Lien Reduction for the Worker’s Litigation Expenses
When the one-third lien cap is triggered, the insurer’s recoverable lien amount is further reduced by 50% of the worker’s reasonable litigation expenses, as verified by a CPA. This is a significant shift. Under Vasquez and the prior framework, insurers could benefit from a worker’s third-party recovery without bearing any portion of the legal costs.
| Feature | Before SB 258 | After SB 258 |
|---|---|---|
| Insurer lien amount | Could claim full lien from recovery | Capped at lesser of full lien or 1/3 of recovery |
| Worker’s guaranteed share | No statutory floor | At least 2/3 of the third-party recovery |
| Legal cost sharing | No lien reduction for worker’s costs | Lien reduced by half of litigation costs when cap applies |
| Future medical benefit offsets | Permitted in many cases | Prohibited |
| Income benefit reductions | Potentially unlimited offset | Limited to 1/3 of each non-accident-benefit payment |
💡 Pro Tip: SB 258 applies to all cases in which a final judgment, settlement, or disposition had not been entered as of May 31, 2025. If your pending case had not yet been resolved by that date, the new protections may apply.
Free Consultation We’ll help you win the benefits you need to get your life back.
Protections Against Benefit Reductions After a Third-Party Recovery
Under Nevada’s subrogation framework, the insurer’s future obligation to pay compensation benefits is generally reduced by the net amount of a third-party recovery. However, SB 258 places firm limits on how much the insurer can reduce going forward.
Workers’ comp insurers can no longer reduce future accident benefits, including medical benefits, as offsets. Additionally, any reductions to non-accident compensation benefits are limited to one-third of each payment, stopping once the total amount reduced equals the worker’s net recovery.
Notice and Payment Requirements Under the New Law
SB 258 also imposes procedural requirements that protect injured workers. The law requires notification to the workers’ comp insurer in connection with a third-party claim. Once a settlement is reached, any owed lien must be paid in accordance with the statute’s payment provisions.
💡 Pro Tip: Keep detailed records of every workers’ comp payment you receive. Accurate records help ensure the lien amount is correct and that you receive every dollar you are owed.
When You Need a Workers’ Compensation Attorney for a Subrogation Dispute
Subrogation disputes arise when the workers’ comp insurer claims a larger share of your third-party recovery than the law allows, or when the lien calculation is incorrect. These disputes can significantly reduce the amount you take home after a settlement.
A workers’ comp attorney in Las Vegas can evaluate the insurer’s lien, verify that it complies with SB 258’s one-third cap, and confirm that the lien has been properly reduced for litigation expenses. If you dispute an insurer’s lien determination or any related decision, you must file a Request for Hearing under NRS 616C.315 within 70 days of the date the insurer’s determination was mailed. This deadline is strict — missing it forfeits your right to challenge that determination through Nevada’s administrative appeals process. For workers in hospitality, construction, warehouse, and delivery roles across the Las Vegas area, these crossover cases are particularly common.
💡 Pro Tip: Subrogation only comes into play when a third party, someone other than your employer, is at fault for your work injury. If your injury was caused solely by workplace conditions under your employer’s control, subrogation generally does not apply.
How Subrogation Affects Your Take-Home Settlement
The amount you keep from a third-party settlement depends on the size of the insurer’s lien, the legal costs incurred, and the application of SB 258’s protections. Under current Nevada law, the insurer can only take the lesser of the full workers’ compensation lien or one-third of the total third-party recovery, with a further reduction for half of the worker’s reasonable litigation costs when the cap applies.
These rules mean that even if a workers’ comp insurer has paid substantial benefits on your behalf, your third-party recovery is protected. You are entitled to retain at least two-thirds of the gross recovery.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is subrogation in a Nevada workers’ comp case?
Subrogation is the legal right of your workers’ comp insurer to recover the benefits it paid you from a third party who caused your injury. Under NRS 616C.215, the insurer may step into your shoes and pursue the third-party claim, or place a lien on any recovery you obtain.
2. How much can a workers’ comp insurer take from my third-party settlement?
Under SB 258, the insurer’s recovery is capped at the lesser of its full lien amount or one-third of the total third-party recovery. This means you keep at least two-thirds of the settlement. When the one-third cap applies, the insurer’s lien is further reduced by 50% of your reasonable litigation expenses.
3. Does SB 258 apply to cases that were already open before the law passed?
Yes. The revised provisions apply to all cases in which a final judgment, settlement, or disposition had not been entered as of May 31, 2025.
4. Can my workers’ comp insurer reduce my future medical benefits after I settle a third-party claim?
No. Workers’ comp insurers cannot reduce future accident benefits, including medical benefits, as offsets. Reductions to non-accident compensation benefits are limited to one-third of each payment and stop once the total equals your net recovery.
5. Do I need to notify my workers’ comp insurer before filing a third-party lawsuit?
NRS 616C.215 includes notification requirements related to third-party claims and recoveries. You should ensure compliance with these procedural requirements, as failure to follow these steps could affect your case.
Protecting Your Recovery Starts With Understanding Your Rights
Nevada’s subrogation laws directly impact how much money you keep after a work injury involving a third party. The combination of NRS 616C.215 as amended by SB 258 creates a framework that protects injured workers from losing the majority of their third-party recovery to insurer liens, while preserving the insurer’s right to partial reimbursement. However, these cases involve overlapping legal claims, strict deadlines, and detailed lien calculations.
If you are dealing with a workers’ comp subrogation issue or a third-party claim related to a Las Vegas work injury, Shook and Stone is ready to help. Call 702-570-0000 or contact us today to discuss your case.
DIRECTIONS 
